Nancy Morris introduced our guest speaker tonight. Terry Shaw is the Executive Director of the Manitoba Trucking Association (MTA). Terry oversees the planning and priorities of the association. Terry is the lead for political liaison, and relations with all levels of government, in both administrative and legislative functions. He is also the lead on media relations and, along with members of the executive, acts as a spokesperson for the industry.
Terry is a member of a variety of MTA committees, including the executive and Board of Directors. He also represents the MTA with his involvement with Trucking Human Resources Canada, the Manitoba Employers Council, and the Winnipeg and Manitoba Chambers of Commerce. He is also a contributing editor to the Western Canada Highway News.
What is the Carbon Tax and how will it impact us all. What is the benefit? The MTA has some issues with the way that the carbon tax has been structured. The federal carbon tax plan states that the provinces should start at $0/tonne and move up to $50/tonne over 5 years. Going from $0 to $50 represents a 400% increase in just one tax faced by the trucking industry, and by all Manitobans due to the trickle-down effect. In 2018 the tax would be 2.74 cents/litre going to 13.69 cents/litre in 2022 (diesel).
This does not take into consideration that here in Manitoba there is already a carbon tax in place, it`s called a `fuel tax`. It is currently $59/tonne. For diesel in Manitoba, if the additional carbon tax was added on to this, at only $25/tonne, the additional tax burden would be $50M/year. The overall tax burden on all Manitobans is projected to be $248M/year. Fuel represents 1/3 of all operating costs for the trucking industry. This would be a massive burden for the industry. There are 28,000 Manitobans working in the trucking industry in the province.
Terry was quite adamant that he was not against a carbon tax and environmental programming, but it must be thoughtful and collaborative. That way both the industry and government can achieve their goals. They are certainly not keen on ruining the planet! Instead of talking about a tax, we should look at this as an investment. The investment should lead to the goal being sought, reduce green-house gases (GHG). The MTA has had a plan for this since 2015, a strategic and cost-effective reduction of GHG in the trucking sector. It is the `Greeener Trucking Fuel Efficiency Initiative`.
The trucking industry contributes over $2B/year to the provincial economy. It provides a critical service to;
- Agriculture
- Manufacturing
- Construction
- Retail trade
Just like these other sectors, trucking already pays its fair share of taxes and other fees such as licensing, permits and so on, approx. $45K/truck/year in taxes and fees before fuel being included. Manitoba`s economy is founded on trade. About 1/3 of Manitoba`s total GDP comes from trade with other provinces. We also have the 5th most busy international crossing into the U.S.A. at Emerson.
In our personal world, we have many options as to how we will get around in this world. We can walk, bike, drive electric cars, gas cars, large SUV, diesel cars/trucks etc. In the trucking world it is diesel trucks that work on the roads. No other viable options currently. Burdening the trucking industry with an unfocused or unmanageable carbon tax will change nothing as far as GHG is concerned. The MTA provincially and the CTA nationally have both been very active regarding the impact that the industry has on the environment. The obvious and quickest way to reduce GHG is to burn less fuel.
As stated previously, diesel is very expensive and represents 1/3 of the operating costs in the trucking industry. The way to burn less fuel is to increase efficiency. Efficiency gains come in two ways;
- Innovation in technology or technique
- Regulations imposed on the industry
Since 1986, 87% of the efficiency gains have been passed on to the consumer in the form of reduced transportation costs. The industry must also deal with trucks that have a definitive life span on the highway. Ten years seems to be the limit now, with some units being re-tasked off highway after 3 to 4 years. If better technology comes along, the industry will not push back on it. The industry does not need imposed additional taxes to lead to change. They are already highly focused on fuel efficiency.
The industry is already subject to a very wide variety of environmental regulations. Engine technologies have been advancing since the 1990`s in pursuit of pollutant emissions reductions. The first regulations go back as far as 2002. The current environmental regulations are in place through to 2027. These regulations cover the engines, tires and trailers related to fuel efficiencies. The industry is in effect, self policing due to the cost of fuel. The trucking industry has been paying carbon taxes for the past decades in the form of fuel taxes. Increases are coming as soon as September 2018.
What can trucking do to improve efficiencies? First would be to remove regulatory barriers or conflict between provinces. There are potentially 10 different jurisdictions that require the trucking industry to follow conflicting rules on the road. The second would be to advance available technology such as the design of engines, tractors, trailers, tires. If one province doesn`t follow along with advances, then it doesn`t matter what is done in the other provinces. The same holds true with travel to the U.S.A.. If the U.S. adopted the same vehicle weight and dimension regulations as Canada, the entire U.S. trucking industry could recognize a 23% increase in fuel efficiency. That would be a massive, positive impact on the environment.
Finally, the `Greeener Trucking Fuel Initiative`. This was created in partnership with stakeholders outside of the trucking industry. This initiative provides programming for the trucking industry in three phases with the goal of reducing GHGs. If reduction of GHGs is the goal, then the carbon taxes paid by the trucking industry should be invested back into programming for the industry that will achieve the reduction of those GHGs. The program is designed to reduce the two biggest roadblocks to GHG reduction as previously mentioned;
- Technology use or availability
- Regulatory conflict
The industry would self-fund through the carbon tax proceeds, with oversight from a governing body to include;
- Trucking industry
- Environmental groups
- Academia
- Government
Through the three phases to follow, this effort would actually reduce GHGs in Manitoba.
Phase 1; Immediate,
- Create an organization to administer technology promotion and a rebate program for those that take part.
-GHG reduction will be realized by using the carbon tax funds paid by industry to support industry incentives that expand and expedite the uptake of currently available efficiency technologies.
Phase 2; Short to Medium Term,
-GHG reduction from simple regulatory change. There are some technologies available today that would help reduce GHGs, but the industry is not allowed to use. They are items such as wide base tires, 6x2 axles and lift axle technologies.
-Weigh scale bypass programs, increase road safety as well as fuel savings = environmental benefits.
-New investment in infrastructure to support wide base tire program as well as the Long Combination Vehicle Network. Tree planting for wind breaks (also carbon sinks).
Phase 3; Long Term,
-Alternate fuels, automation, platooning
This plan was created in 2015 when the expected carbon tax was $2 to $4/tonne. This would see a reduction of CO2 emissions by over ½ million tonnes by 2030. The recent budget calls for a carbon tax of $25/tonne effective September 2018. This is a huge difference. If these proceeds are re-invested into initiatives approved by industry, meaningful to industry, and managed by industry, this would lead to both environmental and economic success. This entire Green Plan was developed in collaboration with the Provincial Government thinking it was an Environmental Plan, not a Tax Plan. The Provincial Government no longer has an Environmental Plan associated with this tax.
Trucking is a significant part of the provincial economy in and of itself, but in addition, there is 40% of our provincial GDP that is composed of industries that rely on a healthy, cost effective trucking industry. Only 10% of the GHGs in the province come from the trucking industry. The industry is being disproportionately targeted for carbon tax revenues as well as GHG solutions. If the government is serious about GHG reduction, then it must do more than just `take` when it comes to carbon taxes.
Of interest is that agriculture, which owns 1/3 of all GHGs created in Manitoba, is exempt from carbon taxes and reduction activities. Also exempt are other large emitters such as forestry and mining sectors.
In closing, all that the industry is asking is to have its own money come back to it so that the funds can be re-invested into an environmental plan for the future, reducing GHGs. The math as it stands shows that the trucking industry will be asked to cut its profit margin in half!
Terry Shaw, Executive Director – Manitoba Trucking Association
Q/A
1.-President Bob, what does the future look like for alternative fuels, electric?
A.-They truly don`t exist yet. Tesla can`t produce the volume required (estimate production at 100,000 in 2019). Canada has 300,000 trucks on the road. The U.S.A. has 3.3 million. Natural gas, not ready
2.-Darvin Jasper asked if Fuel Cell technology is coming online?
A.-Lots of testing going on. Tesla was looking at Hydrogen as a fuel source. The answer is that diesel is the fuel well into the future. Need to look for efficiencies with it.
3.-Ed Thompson questioned how the fuel taxes work with cross border truck traffic?
A.- IFTA is the agreement that comes into play here. If you travel in a certain jurisdiction, you pay fuel tax to that jurisdiction.
4.-Elaine Thompson asked for a definition of `truck platooning`.
A.-An operator in the first truck with the following 2 trucks very close and automated. There is testing in the U.S.A., not in Canada.
5.- Chuck Crocker asked what the max. length is?
A.- In Manitoba the max. is 3x short trailers. Most common would be the tractor with
2 x53’. In Saskatchewan the max. is tractor with 3x 53’
6.- Dave Morris, what is the Chambers of Commerce doing for the MTA?
A.- Supportive, saying that the government is not living up to its promises.
Terry advised that the original plan was to be revenue neutral for the government. Now the math shows that the government will gain $97million annually.
Chuck Crocker thanked Terry for the very descriptive and in-depth presentation. Provided details not overly evident to the average citizen of Manitoba. Terry was advised that a donation in his name would be made to ShelterBox.