District Conference Highlights
Rotary Sunrise's President Elect and Secretary Elect attended the 2019 District 7020 Conference, PETS and Assembly in Kingston, Jamaica, from April 29th though May 3rd, along with the Presidents and Secretaries Elect from the 3 other Clubs in the Cayman Islands; Rotary Central Cayman Islands, Rotary Cayman Brac and Rotary Club of Grand Cayman.
During the PETS Training, the Presidents and Secretaries Elect were given guidance on club management, setting goals for the club and how to report these to Rotary International and the District. The Conference and Assembly sessions were filled with District and RI updates, as well as upcoming changes and plans for the new Rotary year.
Rotary Sunrise is looking forward to another successful year under PE Pat and is excited to take action with all the incoming Presidents and Secretaries from the other Cayman clubs for the new year ahead.
The Four-Way Test in a post-truth era
By Joseph Epstein
I only recently learned of The Four-Way Test, one of Rotary’s central principles. It is of special interest in the current day, when truth — or, more precisely, truthfulness — seems to be losing its prestige in public life.
Examples are not difficult to find. A current member of the U.S. Senate claimed to have fought in Vietnam, which he didn’t, a major lie that seems not to have impeded his being re-elected to his Senate seat or to his continuing to make severe moral judgements about political opponents. Our current president, with his taste for braggadocio and hyperbole, would appear to operate outside the normal bounds of accuracy and precision of statement that once upon a time used to demark truth. Everywhere you turn, the first of the Four Ways — “Is it the truth?” — would seem more and more in danger of going by the boards.
The Second Way — “Is it fair to all concerned?” — is of course inextricably lashed to the First Way. Truth may be difficult, trying, painful, and much else, but if it is unfair it isn’t quite truth. For truth is impartial, disinterested, by its very nature without favoritism — and hence fair. If you are unfair in your judgements or pronouncements, you are, ipso facto, being less than truthful, and if you are truthful you are, again ipso facto, fair. The two, truth and fairness, do not so much follow, one after or from the other, but travel, like well-trained horses, in tandem. A third horse, making a troika, is to ask, “Have I succeeded in treating my subject with the complexity it deserves?”
Often when we think we are being truthful, we are being less than fair. This seems especially so in politics. Politics has never provided fruitful ground for truth; quite the reverse. No single group is perhaps less noted for consistent truthfulness than politicians. The reason for this is that politics does not seem to allow for neutrality; in politics people are regularly asked — “forced” may be closer to it — to choose sides. Once they do, their version of truth takes on a coloration that is likely to preclude fairness to people with politics different from their own.
Truth and fairness are most elusive where passions are engaged, and few things engage the passions more readily than politics. Left/right, liberal/conservative, Democrat/Republican, each side in the political debate encapsulates a version of virtue: If you’re of the left, then the virtue of social justice is central to your beliefs; if you’re of the right, then that of liberty is central. The reason arguments about politics can get to the shouting stage quicker than arguments on just about any other subject is that they are really arguments about competing ideas of virtue. Attack my politics and you attack my virtue.
What, then, is to be done?
[...]
To find out, Click Here, to finish reading the article.
Read more stories from The Rotarian.